Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

The More Fear, the More Effect? Is There any Threshold Limit for Labelling Cigarette Packs?

Fatemeh Kokabisaghi 1 , 2 , *
Author Information
1 Healthcare and Law Department, Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Department of Management Sciences and Health Economics, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: May 2018, 7 (2); e80383
  • Published Online: May 27, 2018
  • Article Type: Editorial
  • Received: October 12, 2016
  • Revised: April 5, 2017
  • Accepted: July 26, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.80383

To Cite: Kokabisaghi F. The More Fear, the More Effect? Is There any Threshold Limit for Labelling Cigarette Packs?, Health Scope. 2018 ; 7(2):e80383. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.80383.

Copyright © 2018, Journal of Health Scope. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
  • 1. WHO . Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control 2016. 2017. Available from:
  • 2. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW, Brown KS, Cameron R. Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: evidence from Canadian smokers. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(8):1442-5. [PubMed: 15284057]. [PubMed Central: PMC1448469].
  • 3. Pechmann C, Catlin JR. The effects of advertising and other marketing communications on health-related consumer behaviors. Curr Opin Psychology. 2016;10:44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.008.
  • 4. Wigg S, Stafford LD. Health Warnings on Alcoholic Beverages: Perceptions of the Health Risks and Intentions towards Alcohol Consumption. PLoS One. 2016;11(4). e0153027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153027. [PubMed: 27105210]. [PubMed Central: PMC4841515].
  • 5. Elliott BJ. The psychology of fear appeals re-visited. Road safety research, policing and education conference. Sydney. 2003. p. 24-6.
  • 6. Arthur D, Quester P. The Ethicality of Using Fear for Social Advertising. Austral Market J (AMJ). 2003;11(1):12-27. doi: 10.1016/s1441-3582(03)70115-3.
  • 7. Hastings G, Stead M, Webb J. Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. PSYC Market. 2004;21(11):961-86. doi: 10.1002/mar.20043.
  • 8. Katz JE. Individual rights advocacy in tobacco control policies: an assessment and recommendation. Tob Control. 2005;14 Suppl 2:ii31-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.008060. [PubMed: 16046700]. [PubMed Central: PMC1766189].
  • 9. Hastings G, MacFadyen L. Controversies in tobacco control: the limitations of fear messages. Tob Control. 2002;11(1):73-5. [PubMed: 11891372]. [PubMed Central: PMC1747646].
  • 10. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. illustrated, reprint ed. Macmillan: Worth Publishers; 1997.
  • 11. Biener L, McCallum-Keeler G, Nyman AL. Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics. Tob Control. 2000;9(4):401-7. [PubMed: 11106710]. [PubMed Central: PMC1748390].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments