Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Application of A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Accident Analysis Method Selecting in Oil Industry

Omran Ahmadi 1 , Seyyed Bagher Mortazavi 1 , * , Ali Khavanin 1 and Mohammad Gholami Fesharaki 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Occupational Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: May 2018, 7 (2); e80348
  • Published Online: May 27, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 28, 2016
  • Revised: April 23, 2017
  • Accepted: May 29, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.80348

To Cite: Ahmadi O, Mortazavi S B, Khavanin A, Gholami Fesharaki M. Application of A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Accident Analysis Method Selecting in Oil Industry, Health Scope. 2018 ; 7(2):e80348. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.80348.

Copyright © 2018, Journal of Health Scope. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Method
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Katsakiori P, Sakellaropoulos G, Manatakis E. Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models. Safety Sci. 2009;47(7):1007-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.11.002.
  • 2. Leveson N. Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. MIT press; 2011.
  • 3. Carhart N, Yearworth M. The use of system dynamics group model building for analysing event causality within the nuclear industry. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. 2010.
  • 4. Johnson CW. Failure in safety-critical systems: A handbook of accident and incident reporting. Scotland: University of Glasgow Press; 2003.
  • 5. Lundberg J, Rollenhagen C, Hollnagel E. What you find is not always what you fix--how other aspects than causes of accidents decide recommendations for remedial actions. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(6):2132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.003. [PubMed: 20728672].
  • 6. Kontogiannis T, Leopoulos VN, Marmaras N. A comparison of accident analysis techniques for safety-critical man–machine systems. Int J Indust Ergon. 2000;25(4):327-47. doi: 10.1016/s0169-8141(99)00022-0.
  • 7. Morrison LM. Best practices in incident investigation in the chemical process industries with examples from the industry sector and specifically from Nova Chemicals. J Hazard Mater. 2004;111(1-3):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.051. [PubMed: 15231362].
  • 8. Munson S. Assessment of accident investigation methods for wildland firefighting incidents by case study method. 2000.
  • 9. Nivolianitou ZS, Leopoulos VN, Konstantinidou M. Comparison of techniques for accident scenario analysis in hazardous systems. J Loss Prevent Process Indust. 2004;17(6):467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.08.001.
  • 10. Sklet S. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. J Hazard Mater. 2004;111(1-3):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.005. [PubMed: 15231345].
  • 11. Ayeko M. Integrated Safety Investigation Methodology (ISIM)-Investigating for Risk Mitigation. Proceedings of the First Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents (IRIA 2002). Scotland. Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow; 2002.
  • 12. Harris D, Li WC. An extension of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System for use in open systems. Theoretic Issues Ergon Sci. 2011;12(2):108-28. doi: 10.1080/14639220903536559.
  • 13. Walker M, Bills K. Analysis, causality and proof in safety investigations. Aviation Research and Analysis Report (AR-2007-053). Canberra: Australian Transport Safety Bureau; 2008.
  • 14. Rahmani A, Khadem M, Madreseh E, Aghaei HA, Raei M, Karchani M. Descriptive Study of Occupational Accidents and their Causes among Electricity Distribution Company Workers at an Eight-year Period in Iran. Saf Health Work. 2013;4(3):160-5. doi: 10.1016/ [PubMed: 24106647]. [PubMed Central: PMC3791088].
  • 15. Sadeghain M, Farid RA, Dormohammadi A, Aghaei HA, Rahmani A, Farhadi R, et al. Assessment of the prevalence of occupational accidents and their influential actors in an electricity distribution company during a five-year period. Electron Physician. 2013;5(2):643-50. doi: 10.14661/2013.643-650. [PubMed: 26120397]. [PubMed Central: PMC4477756].
  • 16. Hendrick K, Benner L. Investigating accidents with STEP. CRC Press; 1986.
  • 17. Bird FE, Germain GL. Practical loss control leadership. USA: Det Norske Veritas; 1996.
  • 18. Groeneweg J. Controlling the controllable. The management of safety. Leiden: DSWO Press; 1996.
  • 19. Pilot S. What is fault tree analysis. Qual Prog. 2002;35(3):120.
  • 20. Ugurlu O, Kose E, Yildirim U, Yuksekyildiz E. Marine accident analysis for collision and grounding in oil tanker using FTA method. Maritime Policy Manag. 2013;42(2):163-85. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.856524.
  • 21. Visser JP. Developments in HSE management in oil and gas exploration. and production. Safety Management: The challenge of change. 1998.
  • 22. de Dianous V, Fievez C. ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. J Hazard Mater. 2006;130(3):220-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010. [PubMed: 16107301].
  • 23. Markowski AS, Mannan MS. Fuzzy risk matrix. J Hazard Mater. 2008;159(1):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.055. [PubMed: 18440700].
  • 24. Hopkins A. Lessons from Longford: the Esso gas plant explosion. CCH Australia Ltd; 2000.
  • 25. Benner L. Rating accident models and investigation methodologies. J Safety Res. 1985;16(3):105-26. doi: 10.1016/0022-4375(85)90038-6.
  • 26. Philley J, Pearson K, Sepeda A. Updated CCPS Investigation Guidelines book. J Hazard Mater. 2003;104(1-3):137-47. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(03)00240-1.
  • 27. Saaty TL, Takizawa M. Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks. Eur J Operation Res. 1986;26(2):229-37. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90184-0.
  • 28. Saaty TL. Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications; 2001.
  • 29. Chang DY. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Operat Res. 1996;95(3):649-55. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
  • 30. Hale AR, Heming BHJ, Smit K, Rodenburg FGT, van Leeuwen ND. Evaluating safety in the management of maintenance activities in the chemical process industry. Safety Sci. 1998;28(1):21-44. doi: 10.1016/s0925-7535(97)00061-1.
  • 31. Dien Y, Dechy N, Guillaume E. Accident investigation: From searching direct causes to finding in-depth causes – Problem of analysis or/and of analyst? Safety Sci. 2012;50(6):1398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.010.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments