Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Development and Psychometric Properties of the Family Support Questionnaire for Adherence to Low Fat Diet in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

Hassan Okati-Aliabad 1 , Shahrzad Sarabandi 2 , * , Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam 1 , Farzaneh Montazerifar 3 and Hassan Askari 3
Authors Information
1 Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
2 MSc Student of Health Education, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3 Pregnancy Health Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: February 2018, 7 (1); e68261
  • Published Online: February 28, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 21, 2016
  • Revised: December 21, 2016
  • Accepted: December 31, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.68261

To Cite: Okati-Aliabad H, Sarabandi S, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Montazerifar F, Askari H. et al. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Family Support Questionnaire for Adherence to Low Fat Diet in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease, Health Scope. 2018 ; 7(1):e68261. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.68261.

Copyright © 2018, Journal of Health Scope. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
  • 1. G. B. D. Mortality , Causes of Death C. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385(9963):117-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. [PubMed: 25530442].
  • 2. Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, Bittner V, Comoss P, Foody JM, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2007;115(20):2675-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180945. [PubMed: 17513578].
  • 3. Hooper L, Martin N, Abdelhamid A, Davey Smith G. Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6). CD011737. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011737. [PubMed: 26068959].
  • 4. Bovbjerg VE, McCann BS, Brief DJ, Follette WC, Retzlaff BM, Dowdy AA, et al. Spouse support and long-term adherence to lipid-lowering diets. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(5):451-60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117447. [PubMed: 7879789].
  • 5. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice:. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  • 6. Kelsey K, Earp JA, Kirkley BG. Is social support beneficial for dietary change? A review of the literature. Fam Community Health. 1997;20(3):70-82. doi: 10.1097/00003727-199710000-00008.
  • 7. Boutin-Foster C. Getting to the heart of social support: a qualitative analysis of the types of instrumental support that are most helpful in motivating cardiac risk factor modification. Heart Lung. 2005;34(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.09.002. [PubMed: 15647731].
  • 8. Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30(2):170-95. doi: 10.1177/1090198102251030. [PubMed: 12693522].
  • 9. Aggarwal B, Liao M, Allegrante JP, Mosca L. Low social support level is associated with non-adherence to diet at 1 year in the Family Intervention Trial for Heart Health (FIT Heart). J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42(6):380-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2009.08.006. [PubMed: 20696617].
  • 10. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(3):304-12. doi: 10.1080/08836610701677659. [PubMed: 18020940].
  • 11. Chair SY, Wong KB, Tang JY, Wang Q, Cheng HY. Social support as a predictor of diet and exercise self-efficacy in patients with coronary artery disease. Contemp Nurse. 2015;51(2-3):188-99. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1171726. [PubMed: 27030520].
  • 12. Scholz U, Ochsner S, Hornung R, Knoll N. Does social support really help to eat a low-fat diet? Main effects and gender differences of received social support within the Health Action Process Approach. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2013;5(2):270-90. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12010. [PubMed: 23625820].
  • 13. Heitman LK. The influence of social support on cardiovascular health in families. Fam Community Health. 2006;29(2):131-42. doi: 10.1097/00003727-200604000-00008. [PubMed: 16552290].
  • 14. Luszczynska A, Cieslak R. Mediated effects of social support for healthy nutrition: fruit and vegetable intake across 8 months after myocardial infarction. Behav Med. 2009;35(1):30-8. doi: 10.3200/BMED.35.1.30-38. [PubMed: 19297302].
  • 15. Crookes DM, Shelton RC, Tehranifar P, Aycinena C, Gaffney AO, Koch P, et al. Social networks and social support for healthy eating among Latina breast cancer survivors: implications for social and behavioral interventions. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(2):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0475-6. [PubMed: 26202538].
  • 16. Franks MM, Stephens MA, Rook KS, Franklin BA, Keteyian SJ, Artinian NT. Spouses' provision of health-related support and control to patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation. J Fam Psychol. 2006;20(2):311-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.311. [PubMed: 16756407].
  • 17. Sayers SL, Riegel B, Pawlowski S, Coyne JC, Samaha FF. Social support and self-care of patients with heart failure. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(1):70-9. doi: 10.1007/s12160-007-9003-x. [PubMed: 18347906].
  • 18. Sher TG, Bellg AJ, Braun L, Domas A, Rosenson R, Canar WJ. Partners for Life: a theoretical approach to developing an intervention for cardiac risk reduction. Health Educ Res. 2002;17(5):597-605. doi: 10.1093/her/17.5.597. [PubMed: 12408204].
  • 19. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987;16(6):825-36. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3. [PubMed: 3432232].
  • 20. Di Noia J, Thompson D, Woods L. A new measure of dietary social support among African American adolescents. Am J Health Behav. 2013;37(3):299-309. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.3.2. [PubMed: 23985176].
  • 21. Stanton CA, Green SL, Fries EA. Diet-specific social support among rural adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(4):214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.10.001. [PubMed: 17606247].
  • 22. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education; 2013.
  • 23. Burns RJ, Rothman AJ, Fu SS, Lindgren B, Joseph AM. The relation between social support and smoking cessation: revisiting an established measure to improve prediction. Ann Behav Med. 2014;47(3):369-75. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9558-7. [PubMed: 24222508].
  • 24. Hammer LB, Kossek EE, Yragui NL, Bodner TE, Hanson GC. Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure of Family Supportive Supervisor Behaviors (FSSB). J Manage. 2009;35(4):837-56. doi: 10.1177/0149206308328510. [PubMed: 21660254].
  • 25. Morelli SA, Lee IA, Arnn ME, Zaki J. Emotional and instrumental support provision interact to predict well-being. Emotion. 2015;15(4):484-93. doi: 10.1037/emo0000084. [PubMed: 26098734].
  • 26. Cyranowski JM, Zill N, Bode R, Butt Z, Kelly MA, Pilkonis PA, et al. Assessing social support, companionship, and distress: National Institute of Health (NIH) Toolbox Adult Social Relationship Scales. Health Psychol. 2013;32(3):293-301. doi: 10.1037/a0028586. [PubMed: 23437856].
  • 27. Frohlich DO. The social support model for people with chronic health conditions: A proposal for future research. Soc Theory Health. 2014;12(2):218-34. doi: 10.1057/sth.2014.3.
  • 28. Silverio CD, Dantas RA, Carvalho AR. [Gender-specific evaluation of coronary disease patients' self-esteem and social support]. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43(2):407-14. doi: 10.1590/S0080-62342009000200021. [PubMed: 19655683].
  • 29. Bucholz EM, Strait KM, Dreyer RP, Geda M, Spatz ES, Bueno H, et al. Effect of low perceived social support on health outcomes in young patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the VIRGO (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients) study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(5). e001252. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001252. [PubMed: 25271209].
  • 30. Sorensen EA, Wang F. Social support, depression, functional status, and gender differences in older adults undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Lung. 2009;38(4):306-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.10.009. [PubMed: 19577702].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments