Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar
Corrected Proof scheduled for 7 (4)

Studying the Efficiency of Respiratory Masks Used By Workers in Refractory Companies for Controlling Exposure to Refractory Ceramic Fibers and Particles in a Steel Industry

Mansour Zare 1 , Majid Faraji 2 and Masoud Rismanchian 2 , *
Authors Information
1 MSc Student, Student Research Committee AND Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Article information

To Cite: Zare M, Faraji M, Rismanchian M. Studying the Efficiency of Respiratory Masks Used By Workers in Refractory Companies for Controlling Exposure to Refractory Ceramic Fibers and Particles in a Steel Industry, Health Scope. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e63941. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.63941.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Footnote
References
  • 1. Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Occupational exposure to refractory ceramic fibers. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH Publications Dissemination; 2006.
  • 2. MacKinnon PA, Lentz TJ, Rice CH, Lockey JE, Lemasters GK, Gartside PS. Electron microscopy study of refractory ceramic fibers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16(10):944-51. doi: 10.1080/104732201300367191. [PubMed: 11599543].
  • 3. Mast RW, Maxim LD, Utell MJ, Walker AM. Refractory ceramic fiber: toxicology, epidemiology, and risk analyses: A review. Inhal Toxicol. 2000;12(5):359-99. doi: 10.1080/08958370050165247. [PubMed: 10880135].
  • 4. Rice CH, Levin LS, Borton EK, Lockey JE, Hilbert TJ, Lemasters GK. Exposures to refractory ceramic fibers in manufacturing and related operations: a 10-year update. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005;2(9):462-73. doi: 10.1080/15459620500240659. [PubMed: 16091350].
  • 5. Lockey JE, LeMasters GK, Levin L, Rice C, Yiin J, Reutman S, et al. A longitudinal study of chest radiographic changes of workers in the refractory ceramic fiber industry. Chest. 2002;121(6):2044-51. [PubMed: 12065376].
  • 6. Utell MJ, Maxim LD. Refractory ceramic fiber (RCF) toxicity and epidemiology: a review. Inhal Toxicol. 2010;22(6):500-21. doi: 10.3109/08958370903521224. [PubMed: 20388033].
  • 7. Chien VC, Chai SK, Hai DN, Takaro T, Checkoway H, Keifer M, et al. Pneumoconiosis among workers in a Vietnamese refractory brick facility. Am J Ind Med. 2002;42(5):397-402. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10125. [PubMed: 12382252].
  • 8. Shih TS, Lu PY, Chen CH, Soo JC, Tsai CL, Tsai PJ. Exposure profiles and source identifications for workers exposed to crystalline silica during a municipal waste incinerator relining period. J Hazard Mater. 2008;154(1-3):469-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.047. [PubMed: 18063296].
  • 9. Banks DE, Balaan M, Wang ML. Silicosis in the 1990s, revisited. Chest. 1997;111(4):837-8. [PubMed: 9106552].
  • 10. Steenland K, Mannetje A, Boffetta P, Stayner L, Attfield M, Chen J, et al. Pooled exposure–response analyses and risk assessment for lung cancer in 10 cohorts of silica-exposed workers: an IARC multicentre study. Cancer Cause Control. 2001;12(9):773-84. doi: 10.1023/a:1012214102061.
  • 11. Gao S, Kim J, Yermakov M, Elmashae Y, He X, Reponen T, et al. Performance of N95 FFRs against combustion and NaCl aerosols in dry and moderately humid air: Manikin-based study. Ann Occup Hyg. 2016;60(6):748-60. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew019. [PubMed: 27094179].
  • 12. Brosseau LM, Ellenbecker MJ, Evans JS. Collection of silica and asbestos aerosols by respirators at steady and cyclic flow. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1990;51(8):420-6. doi: 10.1080/15298669091369880. [PubMed: 2168122].
  • 13. Cheng YS, Holmes TD, Fan B. Evaluation of respirator filters for asbestos fibers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006;3(1):26-35. doi: 10.1080/15459620500444046. [PubMed: 16482975].
  • 14. Ortiz LW, Soderholm SC, Valdez FO. Penetration of respirator filters by an asbestos aerosol. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1988;49(9):451-60. doi: 10.1080/15298668891380060. [PubMed: 3177224].
  • 15. Riala REE, Riipinen HM. Respirator and high efficiency particulate air filtration unit performance in asbestos abatement. Appl Occup Env Hy. 1998;13(1):32-40. doi: 10.1080/1047322x.1998.10389544.
  • 16. Cho KJ, Turkevich L, Miller M, McKay R, Grinshpun SA, Ha K, et al. Penetration of fiber versus spherical particles through filter media and faceseal leakage of N95 filtering facepiece respirators with cyclic flow. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(3):109-15. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.752321. [PubMed: 23339437]. [PubMed Central: PMC4686138].
  • 17. He X, Grinshpun SA, Reponen T, Yermakov M, McKay R, Haruta H, et al. Laboratory evaluation of the particle size effect on the performance of an elastomeric half-mask respirator against ultrafine combustion particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013;57(7):884-97. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/met014. [PubMed: 23609115].
  • 18. He X, Yermakov M, Reponen T, McKay RT, James K, Grinshpun SA. Manikin-based performance evaluation of elastomeric respirators against combustion particles. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(4):203-12. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.760063. [PubMed: 23442086].
  • 19. Liu BYU, Sega K, Rubow KL, Lenhart SW, Myers WR. In-mask aerosol sampling for powered air purifying respirators. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 2010;45(4):278-83. doi: 10.1080/15298668491399785.
  • 20. Eller PM, Cassinelli ME. Particulates not otherwise regulated, total. 0500. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. 4. Diane Publishing; 1994.
  • 21. Eller PM, Cassinelli ME. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. 1994.
  • 22. Bahloul A, Mahdavi A, Haghighat F, Ostiguy C. Evaluation of N95 filtering facepiece respirator efficiency with cyclic and constant flows. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(8):499-508. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.877590. [PubMed: 24467223].
  • 23. Rengasamy S, Eimer BC. N95-companion measurement of cout/cin ratios for two n95 filtering facepiece respirators and one surgical mask. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(10):527-32. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818224. [PubMed: 23984654].
  • 24. Rengasamy S, Eimer BC, Shaffer RE. Evaluation of the performance of the N95-companion: effects of filter penetration and comparison with other aerosol instruments. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(7):417-26. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.685838. [PubMed: 22642759].
  • 25. Nelson TJ, Colton CE. The effect of inhalation resistance on facepiece leakage. American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHAJ). 2000;61(1):102-5. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984522.
  • 26. The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL), NIOSH-approved P100 particulate filtering facepiece respirators. 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/p100list1.html.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments