Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Construction and Demolition Waste and Its Management Challenges in Iran: A Case Study in Tabriz City

Hassan Taghipour 1 , * , Reza Taghizadeh Jazadani 2 , Reza Dehghanzadeh 1 , Mohamad Asghari Jafarabadi 3 , Mohsen Mir Mohammadi 4 and Mehdi Ghayebzadeh 1
Authors Information
1 Health and Environment Research Center, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Department of Environmental Engineering, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: 8 (2); e62313
  • Published Online: May 13, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 28, 2017
  • Revised: January 19, 2018
  • Accepted: February 5, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.62313

To Cite: Taghipour H, Taghizadeh Jazadani R , Dehghanzadeh R, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Mir Mohammadi M , et al. Construction and Demolition Waste and Its Management Challenges in Iran: A Case Study in Tabriz City, Health Scope. Online ahead of Print ; 8(2):e62313. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.62313.

Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Cochran K, Townsend T, Reinhart D, Heck H. Estimation of regional building-related C&D debris generation and composition: Case study for Florida, US. Waste Manag. 2007;27(7):921-31. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.023. [PubMed: 17258446].
  • 2. Yuan HP, Shen LY, Hao JJL, Lu WS. A model for cost–benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management throughout the waste chain. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 2011;55(6):604-12. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.004.
  • 3. Saca N, Dimache A, Radu LR, Iancu I. Leaching behavior of some demolition wastes. J Mater Cycles Waste. 2015;19(2):623-30. doi: 10.1007/s10163-015-0459-7.
  • 4. Ambros WM, Sampaio CH, Cazacliu BG, Miltzarek GL, Miranda LR. Usage of air jigging for multi-component separation of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag. 2017;60(Suppl C):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.029. [PubMed: 27908507].
  • 5. De Melo AB, Gonçalves AF, Martins IM. Construction and demolition waste generation and management in Lisbon (Portugal). Resourc Conserv Recycl. 2011;55(12):1252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.010.
  • 6. Jang YC, Townsend TG. Occurrence of organic pollutants in recovered soil fines from construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag. 2001;21(8):703-15. [PubMed: 11699628].
  • 7. Somasundaram S, Jeon TW, Kang YY, Kim WI, Jeong SK, Kim YJ, et al. Characterization of wastes from construction and demolition sector. Environ Monit Assess. 2015;187(1):4200. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4200-0. [PubMed: 25504191].
  • 8. Department for Environment FRA - UK Government. Statistics on waste statistical notice. 2013, [updated 2015]. Available from:
  • 9. Yuan H, Shen L. Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Manag. 2011;31(4):670-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.030. [PubMed: 21169008].
  • 10. Omrani GA, Karbassi A, Monavari M, Usefi N. [Survey on collection, recycling and disposal condition of construction waste: Case study in Tehran]. J Environ Sci Tech. 2005;7(2):52-61. Persian.
  • 11. Hafezi Mogdas N. Management of construction waste of Shahroud city according to environmental aspects. 7th Conference of Geology Engineering and Environment of Iran. Shahroud Polytechnic University, Shahroud, Iran. 2010. Persian.
  • 12. Esa MR, Halog A, Rigamonti L. Developing strategies for managing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia based on the concept of circular economy. J Mater Cycles Waste. 2016;19(3):1144-54. doi: 10.1007/s10163-016-0516-x.
  • 13. Esa MR, Halog A, Rigamonti L. Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 2017;120(Suppl C):219-29. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.014.
  • 14. Statistical Center of Iran. 2016. Available from:
  • 15. Ding T, Xiao J. Estimation of building-related construction and demolition waste in Shanghai. Waste Manag. 2014;34(11):2327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.029. [PubMed: 25164857].
  • 16. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Estimating 2003 building-related construction and demolition materials amounts. Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Washington DC; 2009.
  • 17. Fine TL. Feedforward neural network methodology. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1999.
  • 18. Melo AD. Construction and demolition waste management: Comparative study. Brazil, Portugal, Lisbon; 2009.
  • 19. Huang B, Wang X, Kua H, Geng Y, Bleischwitz R, Ren J. Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3R principle. Resourc Conserv Recycl. 2018;129:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.029.
  • 20. Yang H, Xia J, Thompson JR, Flower RJ. Urban construction and demolition waste and landfill failure in Shenzhen, China. Waste Manag. 2017;63:393-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.026. [PubMed: 28153408].
  • 21. Patel S, Pansuria A, Shah V, Patel S. Construction and demolition waste recycling. Int J Innov Res Sci Tech. 2014;1(7):266-86.
  • 22. Organization CoINS. The life of Iranian buildings is the second time in other countries. 2016. Available from:
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments