Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Prioritization of Human Factors Variables in the Management of Major Accident Hazards in Process Industries Using Fuzzy AHP Approach

Leila Omidi 1 , Seyed Abolfazl Zakerian 1 , * , Jebraeil Nasl Saraji 1 , Esmaeil Hadavandi 2 and Mir Saeed Yekaninejad 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran
3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: November 2018, 7 (4); e61649
  • Published Online: November 5, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: September 12, 2017
  • Revised: February 23, 2018
  • Accepted: April 17, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.61649

To Cite: Omidi L, Zakerian S A, Nasl Saraji J, Hadavandi E , Yekaninejad M S . Prioritization of Human Factors Variables in the Management of Major Accident Hazards in Process Industries Using Fuzzy AHP Approach, Health Scope. 2018 ; 7(4):e61649. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.61649.

Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. González Dan JR, Arnaldos J, Darbra RM. Introduction of the human factor in the estimation of accident frequencies through fuzzy logic. Saf Sci. 2017;97:134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.012.
  • 2. Khan FI, Abbasi SA. Accident hazard index: A multi-attribute method for process industry hazard rating. Process Saf Env Protect. 1997;75(4):217-24. doi: 10.1205/095758297529093.
  • 3. McAndrews KL. Consequences of macondo: A summary of recently proposed and enacted changes to us offshore drilling safety and environmental regulation. SPE Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference, 21-23 March, Houston, Texas, USA. The University of Texas at Austin. Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2013.
  • 4. Nicol J. Have Australias major hazard facilities learnt from the Longford disaster?: An evaluation of the impact of the 1998 esso Longford explosion on major hazard facilities in 2001. Barton, A.C.T.: Institution of Engineers, Australia; 2001. 53 p.
  • 5. Jaques T. Reshaping crisis management: The challenge for organizational design. Organ Dev J. 2010;28(1):9.
  • 6. Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Human factors in the management of major accident hazards. 2005. Available from:
  • 7. Great Britain Health Safety Executive. Reducing error and influencing behaviour. Second, illustrated, revised ed. HSE Books; 2009.
  • 8. Crowl DA. Human factors methods for improving performance in the process industries. John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
  • 9. Sawacha E, Naoum S, Fong D. Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites. Int J Proj Manag. 1999;17(5):309-15. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00042-8.
  • 10. Cooper MD. Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science. 2000;36(2):111-36. doi: 10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00035-7.
  • 11. Jafari M, Gharari M, Ghafari M, Omidi L, Kalantari S, Asadolah-Fardi G. The influence of safety training on safety climate factors in a construction site. Int J Occup Hygiene. 2015;6(2):81-7.
  • 12. Siu OL, Phillips DR, Leung TW. Age differences in safety attitudes and safety performance in Hong Kong construction workers. J Safety Res. 2003;34(2):199-205. [PubMed: 12737959].
  • 13. Jafari MJ, Gharari M, Kalantari S, Omidi L, Ghaffari M, Fardi GRA. [The influence of safety training on improvement in safety climate in construction sites of a firm]. Saf Promot Injury Prevent. 2015;2(4):257-64. Persian.
  • 14. Darbra RM, Palacios A, Casal J. Domino effect in chemical accidents: Main features and accident sequences. J Hazard Mater. 2010;183(1-3):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.061. [PubMed: 20709447].
  • 15. Sneddon A, Mearns K, Flin R. Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in offshore drilling crews. Saf Sci. 2013;56:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.027.
  • 16. Rundmo T, Hestad H, Ulleberg P. Organisational factors, safety attitudes and workload among offshore oil personnel. Saf Sci. 1998;29(2):75-87. doi: 10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00008-3.
  • 17. Kalantary S, Dehghani A, Yekaninejad MS, Omidi L, Rahimzadeh M. The effects of occupational noise on blood pressure and heart rate of workers in an automotive parts industry. ARYA Atheroscler. 2015;11(4):215-9. [PubMed: 26478728]. [PubMed Central: PMC4593656].
  • 18. Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. University of California: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
  • 19. Tsaur SH, Chang TY, Yen CH. The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Manage. 2002;23(2):107-15. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5177(01)00050-4.
  • 20. Asghari M, Nassiri P, Monazzam MR, Golbabaei F, Arabalibeik H, Shamsipour A, et al. Weighting criteria and prioritizing of heat stress indices in surface mining using a Delphi technique and fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2017;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s40201-016-0264-9. [PubMed: 28101366]. [PubMed Central: PMC5237529].
  • 21. Roshamida AJ, Amir MAU, Zulkifly MR. Risk assessment of dry bulk cargo operations using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICICTM). 2016. p. 146-59.
  • 22. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inf Control. 1965;8(3):338-53. doi: 10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x.
  • 23. Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ulukan Z. Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Inf Manage. 2003;16(6):382-94. doi: 10.1108/09576050310503367.
  • 24. Hsieh TY, Lu ST, Tzeng GH. Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Project Manage. 2004;22(7):573-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002.
  • 25. Hanine M, Boutkhoum O, Tikniouine A, Agouti T. A new web-based framework development for fuzzy multi-criteria group decision-making. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2198-1.
  • 26. Chang DY. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Europ J Oper Res. 1996;95(3):649-55. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
  • 27. Dağdeviren M, Yüksel İ. Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Inf Sci. 2008;178(6):1717-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016.
  • 28. Sun CC. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37(12):7745-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066.
  • 29. Lin HF, Lee HS, Da Wei W. Evaluation of factors influencing knowledge sharing based on a fuzzy AHP approach. J Inf Sci. 2008;35(1):25-44. doi: 10.1177/0165551508091310.
  • 30. Ayağ Z, Özdemir RG. A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. J Intell Manuf. 2006;17(2):179-90. doi: 10.1007/s10845-005-6635-1.
  • 31. Buckley JJ. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Set Syst. 1985;17(3):233-47. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
  • 32. Zhao R, Govind R. Algebraic characteristics of extended fuzzy numbers. Inf Sci. 1991;54(1-2):103-30. doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(91)90047-x.
  • 33. Kwong CK, Bai H. Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Transactions. 2010;35(7):619-26. doi: 10.1080/07408170304355.
  • 34. Jafari MJ, Askarian AR, Omidi L, Miri Lavasani MR, Taghavi L, Ashori AR. The assessment of independent layers of protection in gas sweetening towers of two gas refineries. Saf promot injury prevent (Tehran). 2014;2(2):103-12.
  • 35. Hofmann DA, Stetzer A. A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Personnel Psychol. 1996;49(2):307-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01802.x.
  • 36. Castillo-Rosa J, Suárez-Cebador M, Rubio-Romero JC, Aguado JA. Personal factors and consequences of electrical occupational accidents in the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors. Saf Sci. 2017;91:286-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.021.
  • 37. Oliver A, Cheyne A, Tomás JM, Cox S. The effects of organizational and individual factors on occupational accidents. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2002;75(4):473-88. doi: 10.1348/096317902321119691.
  • 38. Ismail Z, Doostdar S, Harun Z. Factors influencing the implementation of a safety management system for construction sites. Saf Sci. 2012;50(3):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.001.
  • 39. Gordon RPE. The contribution of human factors to accidents in the offshore oil industry. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 1998;61(1-2):95-108. doi: 10.1016/s0951-8320(98)80003-3.
  • 40. Kinateder M, Pauli P, Müller M, Krieger J, Heimbecher F, Rönnau I, et al. Human behaviour in severe tunnel accidents: Effects of information and behavioural training. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2013;17:20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2012.09.001.
  • 41. Rasmussen J, Nixon P, Warner F. Human error and the problem of causality in analysis of accidents [and discussion]. Philos T R Soc: Biol Sci. 1990;327(1241):449-62. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0088.
  • 42. Sklet S, Ringstad AJ, Steen SA, Tronstad L, Haugen S, Seljelid J, et al. Monitoring of human and organizational factors influencing the risk of major accidents. SPE International conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production. Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2010.
  • 43. Wagenaar WA, Groeneweg J. Accidents at sea: Multiple causes and impossible consequences. Int J Man Mach Stud. 1987;27(5-6):587-98. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80017-2.
  • 44. Kelloway EK, Stinson V, MacLean C. Eyewitness testimony in occupational accident investigations: Towards a research agenda. Law Hum Behav. 2004;28(1):115-32. [PubMed: 15055344].
  • 45. Veazie MA, Landen DD, Bender TR, Amandus HE. Epidemiologic research on the etiology of injuries at work. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:203-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.001223. [PubMed: 8054082].
  • 46. Holcom ML, Lehman WEK, Simpson DD. Employee accidents: Influences of personal characteristics, job characteristics, and substance use in jobs differing in accident potential. J Saf Res. 1993;24(4):205-21. doi: 10.1016/0022-4375(93)80002-s.
  • 47. Hudlicka E. To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human–computer interaction. Int J Hum-Comput St. 2003;59(1-2):1-32. doi: 10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00047-8.
  • 48. Meshkati N. Human factors in large-scale technological systems' accidents: Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl. Ind Crisis Q. 2016;5(2):133-54. doi: 10.1177/108602669100500203.
  • 49. Wu J, Zhao T. C-HFAMF: A new way to accident analysis considering human factor. 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety (ICRMS). Washington DC, USA. 2011. p. 319-22.
  • 50. Rocha LP, Cezar-Vaz MR, Almeida MCV, Borges AM, Silva MS, Sena-Castanheira J. Workloads and occupational accidents in a rural environment. Texto Contexto Enfer. 2015;24(2):325-35. doi: 10.1590/0104-07072015000480014.
  • 51. Mearns K, Flin R, Gordon R, Fleming M. Human and organizational factors in offshore safety. Work Stress. 2010;15(2):144-60. doi: 10.1080/026783701102678370110066616.
  • 52. Salmon PM, Cornelissen M, Trotter MJ. Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Saf Sci. 2012;50(4):1158-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.009.
  • 53. Clarke S, Robertson I. A meta-analytic review of the big five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2005;78(3):355-76. doi: 10.1348/096317905x26183.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments