Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Does Crosswise Method Cause Overestimation? An Example to Estimate the Frequency of Symptoms Associated With Sexually Transmitted Infections in General Population: A Cross Sectional Study

Maryam Nasirian 1 , Samira Hosseini Hooshyar 2 , Arezoo Saeidifar 3 , Leila Taravatmanesh 2 , Aboubakr Jafarnezhad 4 , Sina Kianersi 2 and Ali Akbar Haghdoost 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Health School, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran
3 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran
4 Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, IR Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: August 2018, 7 (3); e55357
  • Published Online: June 23, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: March 15, 2017
  • Revised: June 17, 2017
  • Accepted: September 17, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.55357

To Cite: Nasirian M, Hosseini Hooshyar S, Saeidifar A, Taravatmanesh L, Jafarnezhad A, et al. Does Crosswise Method Cause Overestimation? An Example to Estimate the Frequency of Symptoms Associated With Sexually Transmitted Infections in General Population: A Cross Sectional Study, Health Scope. 2018 ; 7(3):e55357. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.55357.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Copyright Holder Demo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Marc H, Ben J, Andreas D. Sensitive questions in online surveys: An experimental evaluation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model. University of Bern, Department of Social Sciences; 2014. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/p/bss/wpaper/9.html. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/bsswpaper/9.htm.
  • 2. Krumpal I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual Quant. 2011;47(4):2025-47. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9.
  • 3. Jann B, Brandenberger L. An experimental survey measuring plagiarism using the crosswise model. Codebook and documentation. 2012.
  • 4. Tan MT, Tang ML, Tian GL, Yuen KC. Bayesian non-randomized response models for surveys with sensitive questions. Statistics Interface. 2009;2(1):13-25.
  • 5. Vakilian K, Mousavi SA, Keramat A. Estimation of sexual behavior in the 18-to-24-years-old Iranian youth based on a crosswise model study. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-28. [PubMed: 24410965]. [PubMed Central: PMC3895705].
  • 6. Petroczi A, Nepusz T, Cross P, Taft H, Shah S, Deshmukh N, et al. New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone. Substance Abuse Treat Prevent Policy. 2011;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1747-597x-6-20.
  • 7. Jann B, Jerke J, Krumpal I. Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Crosswise Model: An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism. Public Opin Quarterl. 2011;76(1):32-49. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr036.
  • 8. Jann B. Asking sensitive questions in online surveys: An experimental comparison of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model. University of Vienna, Department of Methods in the Social Sciences; 2013. Available from: http://www.soz.unibe.ch/ueber_uns/personen/jann/presentations_by_ben_jann/e131361/e131371/Jann_Jerke_Krumpal_crosswise_ger.pdf.
  • 9. Marc H, Ben J, Andreas D. Online Survey on "Exams and Written Papers". 2014. Available from: https://ideasrepecorg/p/bss/wpaper/8html#cites.
  • 10. Shamsipour M, Yunesian M, Fotouhi A, Jann B, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Asghari F, et al. Estimating the prevalence of illicit drug use among students using the crosswise model. Subst Use Misuse. 2014;49(10):1303-10. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.897730. [PubMed: 24689805].
  • 11. Kazemzadeh Y, Shokoohi M, Baneshi MR, Haghdoost AA. The Frequency of High-Risk Behaviors Among Iranian College Students Using Indirect Methods: Network Scale-Up and Crosswise Model. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016;5(3). e25130. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.25130. [PubMed: 27818962]. [PubMed Central: PMC5086407].
  • 12. Nakhaee MR, Pakravan F, Nakhaee N. Prevalence of use of anabolic steroids by bodybuilders using three methods in a city of iran. Addict Health. 2013;5(3-4):77-82. [PubMed: 24494162]. [PubMed Central: PMC3905478].
  • 13. Nasirian M, Baneshi MR, Kamali K, Haghdoost AA. Estimation of Prevalence and Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Iran; A model-based approach. J Res Health Sci. 2015;15(3):168-74. [PubMed: 26411663].
  • 14. Ndowa F, Bozicevic I, Mirzazadeh A, Kianoush K. Report of a WHO consultation to review survillance for sexually transmitted infectionsin Iran. 2011.
  • 15. Nasirian M, Baneshi MR, Kamali K, Haghdoost AA. Population-based survey on STI-associated symptoms and health-seeking behaviours among Iranian adults. Sex Transm Infect. 2016;92(3):232-9. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052060. [PubMed: 26399264].
  • 16. National institution of statistics of Iran. Results of population and dwelling census. Tehran, Iran: National Institution of Statistics; 2011. Available from: http://wwwamarorgir/Defaultaspx?tabid=1160.
  • 17. Nasirian M, Karamouzian M, Kamali K, Nabipour AR, Maghsoodi A, Nikaeen R, et al. Care Seeking Patterns of STIs-Associated Symptoms in Iran: Findings of a Population-Based Survey. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;5(1):5-11. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.146. [PubMed: 26673644]. [PubMed Central: PMC4676971].
  • 18. Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(5):859-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859. [PubMed: 17723033].
  • 19. Coutts E, Jann B, Krumpal I, Näher AF. Plagiarism in student papers: prevalence estimates using special techniques for sensitive questions. J Econ Statistics. 2011;231(5-6):749-60.
  • 20. Chaudhuri A. Unbiased Estimation of a Sensitive Proportion in General Sampling by Three Nonrandomized Response Schemes. Journal of Statistic Theory Pract. 2012;6(2):376-81. doi: 10.1080/15598608.2012.673904.
  • 21. Yu JW, Tian GL, Tang ML. Two new models for survey sampling with sensitive characteristic: design and analysis. Metrika. 2007;67(3):251-63. doi: 10.1007/s00184-007-0131-x.
  • 22. Caroline R. Mixing modes of data collection in surveys: A methodological review. London: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods,Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University; 2007. Available from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/418/.
  • 23. Fox GJA. Bayesian randomized item response theory models for sensitive measurements. In: Hambleton WJ, editor. Handbook of modern item response theory. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2015.
  • 24. Akbar Haghdoost A, Reza Baneshi M, Eybpoosh S, Khajehkazemi R. Comparison of three interview methods on response pattern to sensitive and non-sensitive questions. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(6):500-6. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.7673. [PubMed: 24349749]. [PubMed Central: PMC3840838].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments