Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Removal of Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate by Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor, Using Synthetic Media

Jalaleddin Mollaei 1 , Seyed Bagher Mortazavi 2 , * and Ahmad Jonidi Jafari Array
Authors Information
1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: August 15, 2014, 3 (3); e16721
  • Published Online: August 10, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 9, 2013
  • Revised: January 14, 2014
  • Accepted: January 23, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/jhealthscope-16721

To Cite: Mollaei J, Mortazavi S B, Jonidi Jafari A. Removal of Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate by Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor, Using Synthetic Media, Health Scope. 2014 ; 3(3):e16721. doi: 10.17795/jhealthscope-16721.

Copyright © 2014, Health Promotion Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Ariapad A, Zanjanchi MA, Arvand M. Efficient removal of anionic surfactant using partial template-containing MCM-41. Desalination. 2012; 284: 142-9[DOI]
  • 2. Ayati B, Nouri RH, Ganjidoust H. Investigation of surfactants removal by moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). Environ Sci. 2008; 5(4): 134-23
  • 3. Panizza M, Barbucci A, Delucchi M, Carpanese MP, Giuliano A, Cataldo-Hernández M, et al. Electro-Fenton degradation of anionic surfactants. Sep Purif Technol. 2013; 118: 394-8[DOI]
  • 4. Lara Martín PA, Gómez Parra A, González Mazo E. Reactivity and fate of synthetic surfactants in aquatic environments. Trends Analyt Chem. 2008; 27(8): 684-95[DOI]
  • 5. Lawrence KW, Hung TY, Howard HL, Yapijakis C. Handbook of Industrial and Hazardous Wastes Treatment. 2004;
  • 6. Cirelli AF, Ojeda C, Castro MJL, Salgot M. Surfactants in sludge-amended agricultural soils: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2008; 6(3): 135-48[DOI]
  • 7. Mahvi A, Alavi Nakhjavan N, Nadafi K. Investigating of detergents removal from the ghods county wastewatre treatment by activated sludge process. Sci Horiz. 2004; 2: 41-36
  • 8. Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, Wu M, Xing M, Yang J, et al. Impacts of temperature and nitrifying community on nitrification kinetics in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating polluted raw water. Chem Eng J. 2014; 236: 242-50[DOI]
  • 9. Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, Wu M, Xing M, Yang J, et al. Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH4(+)-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted raw water. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 131: 365-73[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Chu L, Wang J. Comparison of polyurethane foam and biodegradable polymer as carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor for treating wastewater with a low C/N ratio. Chemosphere. 2011; 83(1): 63-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Aghapour AA, Moussavi G, Yaghmaeian K. Investigating the performance of a novel cyclic rotating-bed biological reactor compared with a sequencing continuous-inflow reactor for biodegradation of catechol in wastewater. Bioresource technology. 2013; 138: 369-72[DOI]
  • 12. Moussavi G, Mohseni M. The treatment of waste air containing phenol vapors in biotrickling filter. Chemosphere. 2008; 72(11): 1649-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Moussavi G, Mahmoudi M, Barikbin B. Biological removal of phenol from strong wastewaters using a novel MSBR. Water Res. 2009; 43(5): 1295-302[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 2012;
  • 15. Sarfaraz S, Thomas S, Tewari UK, Iyengar L. Anoxic treatment of phenolic wastewater in sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 2004; 38(4): 965-71[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Fernandes H, Jungles MK, Hoffmann H, Antonio RV, Costa RHR. Full-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for domestic wastewater: performance and diversity of microbial communities. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 132: 262-8[DOI]
  • 17. Pizarro C, Donoso Bravo A, Jeison D, Ruiz Filippi G, Chamy R. Biofilm formation for organic matter and sulphate removal in gas-lift reactors. Electron J Biotechnol. 2011; 14(4): 235-9[DOI]
  • 18. Wasche S, Horn H, Hempel DC. Influence of growth conditions on biofilm development and mass transfer at the bulk/biofilm interface. Water Res. 2002; 36(19): 4775-84[PubMed]
  • 19. Taherzadeh D, Picioreanu C, Horn H. Mass transfer enhancement in moving biofilm structures. Biophys J. 2012; 102(7): 1483-92[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Moussavi G, Heidarizad M. The performance of SBR, SCR, and MSCR for simultaneous biodegradation of high concentrations of formaldehyde and ammonia. Sep Purif Technol. 2011; 77(2): 187-95[DOI]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments