Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Anthropometric Dimensions of Foot in Northwestern Iran and Comparison with Other Populations

Mohammad Hajaghazadeh 1 , * , Roya Emamgholizadeh Minaei 1 , Teimour Allahyari 1 and Hamidreza Khalkhali 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Occupational Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: August 2018, 7 (3); e14063
  • Published Online: August 14, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 27, 2017
  • Revised: December 16, 2017
  • Accepted: December 30, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.14063

To Cite: Hajaghazadeh M, Emamgholizadeh Minaei R, Allahyari T, Khalkhali H. Anthropometric Dimensions of Foot in Northwestern Iran and Comparison with Other Populations, Health Scope. 2018 ; 7(3):e14063. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.14063.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author (s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Lee YC, Wang MJ. Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data. Ergonomics. 2015;58(3):513-23. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.974683. [PubMed: 25361465].
  • 2. Wang CS. An analysis and evaluation of fitness for shoe lasts and human feet. Comput Ind. 2010;61(6):532-40. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2010.03.003.
  • 3. Cheng FT, Perng DB. A systematic approach for developing a foot size information system for shoe last design. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;25(2):171-85. doi: 10.1016/s0169-8141(98)00098-5.
  • 4. Menz HB, Morris ME. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people. Gerontology. 2005;51(5):346-51. doi: 10.1159/000086373. [PubMed: 16110238].
  • 5. Paiva de Castro A, Rebelatto JR, Aurichio TR. The relationship between foot pain, anthropometric variables and footwear among older people. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.05.002. [PubMed: 19497557].
  • 6. Branthwaite H, Chockalingam N, Greenhalgh A, Chatzistergos P. The impact of different footwear characteristics, of a ballet flat pump, on centre of pressure progression and perceived comfort. Foot (Edinb). 2014;24(3):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2014.05.004. [PubMed: 24939663].
  • 7. Saro C, Jensen I, Lindgren U, Fellander-Tsai L. Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(5):731-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9192-6. [PubMed: 17342454].
  • 8. Coughlin MJ, Dorris J, Polk E. Operative repair of the fixed hammertoe deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(2):94-104. doi: 10.1177/107110070002100202. [PubMed: 10694020].
  • 9. Menz HB, Gilheany MF, Landorf KB. Foot and ankle surgery in Australia: a descriptive analysis of the medicare benefits schedule database, 1997-2006. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-10. [PubMed: 18822169]. [PubMed Central: PMC2553783].
  • 10. Witana CP, Feng J, Goonetilleke RS. Dimensional differences for evaluating the quality of footwear fit. Ergonomics. 2004;47(12):1301-17. doi: 10.1080/00140130410001712645. [PubMed: 15370849].
  • 11. Cobb SC, James CR, Hjertstedt M, Kruk J. A digital photographic measurement method for quantifying foot posture: validity, reliability, and descriptive data. J Athl Train. 2011;46(1):20-30. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.20. [PubMed: 21214347]. [PubMed Central: PMC3017485].
  • 12. Lee YC, Lin G, Wang MJ. Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0044-7. [PubMed: 25364389]. [PubMed Central: PMC4215017].
  • 13. Witana CP, Xiong S, Zhao J, Goonetilleke RS. Foot measurements from three-dimensional scans: A comparison and evaluation of different methods. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36(9):789-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.06.004.
  • 14. Hong Y, Wang L, Xu DQ, Li JX. Gender differences in foot shape: a study of Chinese young adults. Sports Biomech. 2011;10(2):85-97. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2011.569567. [PubMed: 21834393].
  • 15. Hawes MR, Sovak D, Miyashita M, Kang SJ, Yoshihuku Y, Tanaka S. Ethnic differences in forefoot shape and the determination of shoe comfort. Ergonomics. 1994;37(1):187-96. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963637. [PubMed: 8112275].
  • 16. Lee YC, Kouchi M, Mochimaru M, Wang MJ. Comparing 3d foot shape models between Taiwanese and Japanese females. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2015;44(1):11-20. [PubMed: 27281917].
  • 17. Baba K. Foot measurement for shoe construction with reference to the relationship between foot length, foot breadth, and ball girth. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1974;3(2):149-56. [PubMed: 4465404].
  • 18. Hawes MR, Sovak D. Quantitative morphology of the human foot in a North American population. Ergonomics. 1994;37(7):1213-26. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964899. [PubMed: 8050406].
  • 19. Saghazadeh M, Kitano N, Okura T. Gender differences of foot characteristics in older Japanese adults using a 3D foot scanner. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:29. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0087-4. [PubMed: 26180554]. [PubMed Central: PMC4502464].
  • 20. Wunderlich RE, Cavanagh PR. Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(4):605-11. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200104000-00015. [PubMed: 11283437].
  • 21. Sadeghi F, Mazloumi A, Kazemi Z. An anthropometric data bank for the Iranian working population with ethnic diversity. Appl Ergon. 2015;48:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.009. [PubMed: 25683535].
  • 22. Pourtaghi G, Valipour F, Sadeghialavi H, Lahmi MA. Anthropometric characteristics of Iranian military personnel and their changes over recent years. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2014;5(3):115-24. [PubMed: 25027039].
  • 23. Mirmohammadi SJ, Mehrparvar AH, Mostaghaci M, Davari MH, Bahaloo M, Mashtizadeh S. Anthropometric hand dimensions in a population of Iranian male workers in 2012. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):125-30. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1112108. [PubMed: 26654904].
  • 24. Mirmohammadi SJ, Mehrparvar AH, Jafari S, Mostaghaci M. An assessment of the anthropometric data of Iranian university students. Int J Occup Hyg. 2011;3(2):85-9.
  • 25. International Organization for Standardization . ISO 15535:2012. General requirements for establishing anthropometric databases. ISO; 2012.
  • 26. Xiong S, Goonetilleke RS, Witana CP, Lee Au EY. Modelling foot height and foot shape-related dimensions. Ergonomics. 2008;51(8):1272-89. doi: 10.1080/00140130801996147. [PubMed: 18608473].
  • 27. Tomassoni D, Traini E, Amenta F. Gender and age related differences in foot morphology. Maturitas. 2014;79(4):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.019. [PubMed: 25183323].
  • 28. Kouchi M. Foot dimensions and foot shape: Differences due to growth,generation and ethnic origin. Anthropol Sci. 1998;106(Supplement):161-88. doi: 10.1537/ase.106.Supplement_161.
  • 29. Hisham S, Mamat CR, Azaini Ibrahim M. Multivariate statistical analysis for race variation from foot anthropometry in the Malaysian population. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2012;44(3):285-93. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2012.657682.
  • 30. Manna I, Pradhan D, Ghosh S, Kar SK, Dhara P. A comparative study of foot dimension between adult male and female and evaluation of foot hazards due to using of footwear. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2001;20(4):241-6. doi: 10.2114/jpa.20.241. [PubMed: 11575187].
  • 31. Hemy N, Flavel A, Ishak NI, Franklin D. Estimation of stature using anthropometry of feet and footprints in a Western Australian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(5):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.12.008. [PubMed: 23756512].
  • 32. Ozden H, Balci Y, Demirustu C, Turgut A, Ertugrul M. Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147(2-3):181-4. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.072. [PubMed: 15567624].
  • 33. Krauss I, Grau S, Mauch M, Maiwald C, Horstmann T. Sex-related differences in foot shape. Ergonomics. 2008;51(11):1693-709. doi: 10.1080/00140130802376026. [PubMed: 18941975].
  • 34. Ansuategui Echeita J, Hijmans JM, Smits S, Van der Woude LH, Postema K. Age-related differences in women's foot shape. Maturitas. 2016;94:64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.09.001. [PubMed: 27823747].
  • 35. Hisham S, Mamat CR, Azaini Ibrahim M. Regression analysis for stature estimation from foot anthropometry in Malaysian Chinese. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2012;44(4):333-41. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2012.673637.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments