Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar

Anthropometric Dimensions of Foot in Northwestern Iran and Comparison with Other Populations

Mohammad Hajaghazadeh 1 , * , Roya Emamgholizadeh Minaei 1 , Teimour Allahyari 1 and Hamidreza Khalkhali 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Occupational Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
2 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
Article information
  • Health Scope: August 2018, 7 (3); e14063
  • Published Online: August 14, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: May 27, 2017
  • Revised: December 16, 2017
  • Accepted: December 30, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/jhealthscope.14063

To Cite: Hajaghazadeh M, Emamgholizadeh Minaei R, Allahyari T, Khalkhali H. Anthropometric Dimensions of Foot in Northwestern Iran and Comparison with Other Populations, Health Scope. 2018 ; 7(3):e14063. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.14063.

Copyright © 2018, Author (s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Lee YC, Wang MJ. Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data. Ergonomics. 2015;58(3):513-23. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.974683. [PubMed: 25361465].
  • 2. Wang CS. An analysis and evaluation of fitness for shoe lasts and human feet. Comput Ind. 2010;61(6):532-40. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2010.03.003.
  • 3. Cheng FT, Perng DB. A systematic approach for developing a foot size information system for shoe last design. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;25(2):171-85. doi: 10.1016/s0169-8141(98)00098-5.
  • 4. Menz HB, Morris ME. Footwear characteristics and foot problems in older people. Gerontology. 2005;51(5):346-51. doi: 10.1159/000086373. [PubMed: 16110238].
  • 5. Paiva de Castro A, Rebelatto JR, Aurichio TR. The relationship between foot pain, anthropometric variables and footwear among older people. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.05.002. [PubMed: 19497557].
  • 6. Branthwaite H, Chockalingam N, Greenhalgh A, Chatzistergos P. The impact of different footwear characteristics, of a ballet flat pump, on centre of pressure progression and perceived comfort. Foot (Edinb). 2014;24(3):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2014.05.004. [PubMed: 24939663].
  • 7. Saro C, Jensen I, Lindgren U, Fellander-Tsai L. Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(5):731-8. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9192-6. [PubMed: 17342454].
  • 8. Coughlin MJ, Dorris J, Polk E. Operative repair of the fixed hammertoe deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21(2):94-104. doi: 10.1177/107110070002100202. [PubMed: 10694020].
  • 9. Menz HB, Gilheany MF, Landorf KB. Foot and ankle surgery in Australia: a descriptive analysis of the medicare benefits schedule database, 1997-2006. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008;1(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-10. [PubMed: 18822169]. [PubMed Central: PMC2553783].
  • 10. Witana CP, Feng J, Goonetilleke RS. Dimensional differences for evaluating the quality of footwear fit. Ergonomics. 2004;47(12):1301-17. doi: 10.1080/00140130410001712645. [PubMed: 15370849].
  • 11. Cobb SC, James CR, Hjertstedt M, Kruk J. A digital photographic measurement method for quantifying foot posture: validity, reliability, and descriptive data. J Athl Train. 2011;46(1):20-30. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.20. [PubMed: 21214347]. [PubMed Central: PMC3017485].
  • 12. Lee YC, Lin G, Wang MJ. Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0044-7. [PubMed: 25364389]. [PubMed Central: PMC4215017].
  • 13. Witana CP, Xiong S, Zhao J, Goonetilleke RS. Foot measurements from three-dimensional scans: A comparison and evaluation of different methods. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36(9):789-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.06.004.
  • 14. Hong Y, Wang L, Xu DQ, Li JX. Gender differences in foot shape: a study of Chinese young adults. Sports Biomech. 2011;10(2):85-97. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2011.569567. [PubMed: 21834393].
  • 15. Hawes MR, Sovak D, Miyashita M, Kang SJ, Yoshihuku Y, Tanaka S. Ethnic differences in forefoot shape and the determination of shoe comfort. Ergonomics. 1994;37(1):187-96. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963637. [PubMed: 8112275].
  • 16. Lee YC, Kouchi M, Mochimaru M, Wang MJ. Comparing 3d foot shape models between Taiwanese and Japanese females. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2015;44(1):11-20. [PubMed: 27281917].
  • 17. Baba K. Foot measurement for shoe construction with reference to the relationship between foot length, foot breadth, and ball girth. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1974;3(2):149-56. [PubMed: 4465404].
  • 18. Hawes MR, Sovak D. Quantitative morphology of the human foot in a North American population. Ergonomics. 1994;37(7):1213-26. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964899. [PubMed: 8050406].
  • 19. Saghazadeh M, Kitano N, Okura T. Gender differences of foot characteristics in older Japanese adults using a 3D foot scanner. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8:29. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0087-4. [PubMed: 26180554]. [PubMed Central: PMC4502464].
  • 20. Wunderlich RE, Cavanagh PR. Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(4):605-11. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200104000-00015. [PubMed: 11283437].
  • 21. Sadeghi F, Mazloumi A, Kazemi Z. An anthropometric data bank for the Iranian working population with ethnic diversity. Appl Ergon. 2015;48:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.009. [PubMed: 25683535].
  • 22. Pourtaghi G, Valipour F, Sadeghialavi H, Lahmi MA. Anthropometric characteristics of Iranian military personnel and their changes over recent years. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2014;5(3):115-24. [PubMed: 25027039].
  • 23. Mirmohammadi SJ, Mehrparvar AH, Mostaghaci M, Davari MH, Bahaloo M, Mashtizadeh S. Anthropometric hand dimensions in a population of Iranian male workers in 2012. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):125-30. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1112108. [PubMed: 26654904].
  • 24. Mirmohammadi SJ, Mehrparvar AH, Jafari S, Mostaghaci M. An assessment of the anthropometric data of Iranian university students. Int J Occup Hyg. 2011;3(2):85-9.
  • 25. International Organization for Standardization . ISO 15535:2012. General requirements for establishing anthropometric databases. ISO; 2012.
  • 26. Xiong S, Goonetilleke RS, Witana CP, Lee Au EY. Modelling foot height and foot shape-related dimensions. Ergonomics. 2008;51(8):1272-89. doi: 10.1080/00140130801996147. [PubMed: 18608473].
  • 27. Tomassoni D, Traini E, Amenta F. Gender and age related differences in foot morphology. Maturitas. 2014;79(4):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.07.019. [PubMed: 25183323].
  • 28. Kouchi M. Foot dimensions and foot shape: Differences due to growth,generation and ethnic origin. Anthropol Sci. 1998;106(Supplement):161-88. doi: 10.1537/ase.106.Supplement_161.
  • 29. Hisham S, Mamat CR, Azaini Ibrahim M. Multivariate statistical analysis for race variation from foot anthropometry in the Malaysian population. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2012;44(3):285-93. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2012.657682.
  • 30. Manna I, Pradhan D, Ghosh S, Kar SK, Dhara P. A comparative study of foot dimension between adult male and female and evaluation of foot hazards due to using of footwear. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2001;20(4):241-6. doi: 10.2114/jpa.20.241. [PubMed: 11575187].
  • 31. Hemy N, Flavel A, Ishak NI, Franklin D. Estimation of stature using anthropometry of feet and footprints in a Western Australian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(5):435-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.12.008. [PubMed: 23756512].
  • 32. Ozden H, Balci Y, Demirustu C, Turgut A, Ertugrul M. Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147(2-3):181-4. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.072. [PubMed: 15567624].
  • 33. Krauss I, Grau S, Mauch M, Maiwald C, Horstmann T. Sex-related differences in foot shape. Ergonomics. 2008;51(11):1693-709. doi: 10.1080/00140130802376026. [PubMed: 18941975].
  • 34. Ansuategui Echeita J, Hijmans JM, Smits S, Van der Woude LH, Postema K. Age-related differences in women's foot shape. Maturitas. 2016;94:64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.09.001. [PubMed: 27823747].
  • 35. Hisham S, Mamat CR, Azaini Ibrahim M. Regression analysis for stature estimation from foot anthropometry in Malaysian Chinese. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2012;44(4):333-41. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2012.673637.
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments