Health Scope

Published by: Kowsar
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 8 (2)

Biohydrogen Production as a Clean Fuel by Acid and Alkaline Pretreated Mixed Culture During Glucose Fermentation

Mohammad Mehdi Amin 1 , 2 , Mohammad Ghasemian 1 , 2 , * , Bijan Bina 1 , 2 , Ensiyeh Taheri 2 , 3 and Ali Fatehizadeh 1 , 2
Authors Information
1 Environment Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Student Research Center, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran, Isfahan, Iran
Article information

To Cite: Amin M M, Ghasemian M , Bina B , Taheri E , Fatehizadeh A. Biohydrogen Production as a Clean Fuel by Acid and Alkaline Pretreated Mixed Culture During Glucose Fermentation, Health Scope. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e12903. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope.12903.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. IPCC. Ipcc special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Public-Private-Partnership Legal Resource Center; 2011.
  • 2. USEIA. International energy outlook 2011. 2011. Available from: http://wwweiagov/ieo/pdf/0484(2011)pdf.
  • 3. Kim DH, Kim MS. Hydrogenases for biological hydrogen production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(18):8423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.113. [PubMed: 21435869].
  • 4. Das D, Veziroglu T. Advances in biological hydrogen production processes. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33(21):6046-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.098.
  • 5. Zhu H, Beland M. Evaluation of alternative methods of preparing hydrogen producing seeds from digested wastewater sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2006;31(14):1980-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.019.
  • 6. Amin MM, Bina B, Taheri E, Zare MR, Ghasemian M, Van Ginkel SW, et al. Metabolism and kinetic study of bioH 2 production by anaerobic sludge under different acid pretreatments. Process Biochem. 2017;61:24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2017.06.015.
  • 7. Fernández FJ, Villaseñor J, Infantes D. Kinetic and stoichiometric modelling of acidogenic fermentation of glucose and fructose. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35(9):3877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.052.
  • 8. Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht MC. Mixed culture biotechnology for bioenergy production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007;18(3):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.05.001. [PubMed: 17509864].
  • 9. Lee HS, Krajmalinik-Brown R, Zhang H, Rittmann BE. An electron-flow model can predict complex redox reactions in mixed-culture fermentative bioH2: Microbial ecology evidence. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;104(4):687-97. doi: 10.1002/bit.22442. [PubMed: 19530077].
  • 10. O. Thong S , Prasertsan P, Birkeland NK. Evaluation of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula under thermophilic condition by process performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(2):909-18. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.036. [PubMed: 18768309].
  • 11. Wang YY, Ai P, Hu CX, Zhang YL. Effects of various pretreatment methods of anaerobic mixed microflora on biohydrogen production and the fermentation pathway of glucose. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2011;36(1):390-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.092.
  • 12. Amin MM, Bina B, Taheri E, Fatehizadeh A, Ghasemian M. Stoichiometry evaluation of biohydrogen production from various carbohydrates. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(20):20915-21. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7244-6. [PubMed: 27488706].
  • 13. O. Thong S, Prasertsan P, Birkeland NK. Evaluation of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula under thermophilic condition by process performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(2):909-18. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.036. [PubMed: 18768309].
  • 14. Zhang K, Ren N, Guo C, Wang A, Cao G. Effects of various pretreatment methods on mixed microflora to enhance biohydrogen production from corn stover hydrolysate. J Environ Sci (China). 2011;23(12):1929-36. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60679-1. [PubMed: 22432321].
  • 15. Wang J, Wan W. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33(12):2934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.048.
  • 16. O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Birkeland NK. Evaluation of methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula under thermophilic condition by process performance and microbial community analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(2):909-18. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.036. [PubMed: 18768309].
  • 17. Amin MM, Zilles JL, Greiner J, Charbonneau S, Raskin L, Morgenroth E. Influence of the antibiotic erythromycin on anaerobic treatment of a pharmaceutical wastewater. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(12):3971-7. doi: 10.1021/es060428j. [PubMed: 16830570].
  • 18. American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21 ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.
  • 19. Chang S, Li JZ, Liu F. Evaluation of different pretreatment methods for preparing hydrogen-producing seed inocula from waste activated sludge. Renewable Energ. 2011;36(5):1517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.023.
  • 20. Chaganti SR, Kim DH, Lalman JA. Dark fermentative hydrogen production by mixed anaerobic cultures: Effect of inoculum treatment methods on hydrogen yield. Renewable Energ. 2012;48:117-21. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.04.015.
  • 21. Cheong DY, Hansen CL. Bacterial stress enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production in cattle manure sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;72(4):635-43. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0313-x. [PubMed: 16525779].
  • 22. Lay JJ, Li YY, Noike T. Influences of pH and moisture content on the methane production in high-solids sludge digestion. Water Res. 1997;31(6):1518-24. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00413-7.
  • 23. Craven SE. Increased sporulation of clostridium perfringens in a medium prepared with the prereduced anaerobically sterilized technique or with carbon dioxide or carbonate. J Food Prot. 1988;51(9):700-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-51.9.700. [PubMed: 30991561].
  • 24. Temudo MF, Kleerebezem R, van Loosdrecht M. Influence of the pH on (open) mixed culture fermentation of glucose: A chemostat study. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;98(1):69-79. doi: 10.1002/bit.21412. [PubMed: 17657773].
  • 25. Cheng SS, Chang SM, Chen ST. Effects of volatile fatty acids on a thermophilic anaerobic hydrogen fermentation process degrading peptone. Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(4-5):209-14. doi: 10.2166/wst.2002.0589. [PubMed: 12361012].
  • 26. Demirel B, Yenigun O. Anaerobic acidogenesis of dairy wastewater: The effects of variations in hydraulic retention time with no pH control. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2004;79(7):755-60. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1052.
  • 27. Liu D, Liu D, Zeng RJ, Angelidaki I. Hydrogen and methane production from household solid waste in the two-stage fermentation process. Water Res. 2006;40(11):2230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.03.029. [PubMed: 16725172].
  • 28. Alzate-Gaviria LM, Sebastian PJ, Pérez-Hernández A, Eapen D. Comparison of two anaerobic systems for hydrogen production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and synthetic wastewater. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32(15):3141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.02.034.
  • 29. Gómez X, Morán A, Cuetos MJ, Sánchez ME. The production of hydrogen by dark fermentation of municipal solid wastes and slaughterhouse waste: A two-phase process. J Power Sources. 2006;157(2):727-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.006.
  • 30. Venkata Mohan S, Vijaya Bhaskar Y, Sarma PN. Biohydrogen production from chemical wastewater treatment in biofilm configured reactor operated in periodic discontinuous batch mode by selectively enriched anaerobic mixed consortia. Water Res. 2007;41(12):2652-64. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.015. [PubMed: 17418367].
  • 31. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66(3):506-77. table of contents. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002. [PubMed: 12209002]. [PubMed Central: PMC120791].
  • 32. Kapdan IK, Kargi F. Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2006;38(5):569-82. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.09.015.
  • 33. Luo G, Karakashev D, Xie L, Zhou Q, Angelidaki I. Long-term effect of inoculum pretreatment on fermentative hydrogen production by repeated batch cultivations: Homoacetogenesis and methanogenesis as competitors to hydrogen production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108(8):1816-27. doi: 10.1002/bit.23122. [PubMed: 21381001].
  • 34. Weijma J, Gubbels F, Hulshoff Pol LW, Stams AJ, Lens P, Lettinga G. Competition for H2 between sulfate reducers, methanogens and homoacetogens in a gas-lift reactor. Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(10):75-80. doi: 10.2166/wst.2002.0294. [PubMed: 12188580].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments